The Neo-cons (who are against environmental protection as we are growing more
aware of the consequences of fossil fuels, who are against updating
corporate crime penalties when now billions can be stolen by the Andrew Fastows
and the Michael Milkens, who are against election reforms to allow enormous financing
of the duopoly and to allow corporations to control the elections not only with their
massive contributions but also by way of restricting the national debates)......they needed
to find a moral high-ground......and they did. With the right-to-life issue, they know that
they have an issue that makes them seem humanitarian. And it's an issue that doesn't
cost them a dime! Just some simple-minded rhetoric. Anything that costs money or
hurts the "bottom line" they tend to be against.

They use it to take the focus off of their unincumbered greed, and sound "humane"....
as the air that they want to be allowed to pollute becomes more dangerous to health,
the lakes, rivers and oceans that they want to be allowed to
pollute grows more contaminated, as the electoral process becomes super corrupted by corporations making electronic voting machines that are easily manipulated by fraudulent
election commissioners. They can seem to be on the moral high ground, when they are actually scratching around for something to make themselves look "good".

One might conclude that their motivation is to have easily oppressed bastards around
to work the bad shifts of the bad jobs.....but that is clearly not the reason. America has
an enormous amount of workers - illegals, blacks, poor whites - available for those menial
jobs. The sole reason for these greed mongers to glom on to the
abortion issue is to make themselves look good on SOMETHING......because they know that
without something like this.....well....... they don't have much of a leg to stand on in the eyes
of the average American. There are substantially more have-nots than them, and they excrutiatingly need to get the middle class behind them on SOMETHING!