Prejudice institute\op-ed hate crimes
Understanding Hate Crimes

The Associated Press article began “Hate crimes were down sharply in 2002" (the latest
report.) This is not the first time that this claim of declining hate crimes has been made. Most
likely, it won’t be the last time. While the FBI’s report on hate crimes has been circulating, an even
more powerful report has been suppressed. Across the Atlantic, the European Union has refused to
release a report of its Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia. That report documents an
extraordinary new wave of anti-Semitism in EU countries. While we can only speculate about the
EU’s motives in not publishing their own report, as long as the government and the public want to
delude themselves about the prevalence of hate crimes, its true significance will remain obscured.
Acts motivated by prejudice derive from discrimination and lead to oppression. It is important that
activists understand the sociology of hate crimes and its related acts such as hate speech and
ethnoviolence. Here are my ten points to that understanding.
To begin with about 15 per cent of all police agencies do not report hate crimes. So, of
course, they are underreported. Further, most police and prosecutors do not know and have not
really been trained, to recognize hate crimes.
Second, for various bureaucratic and, in many cases, bigoted reasons, police and
prosecutors do not want to get involved in such arrests and charges. It is not uncommon, for
example, for police to charge someone, say, with “vandalism” as opposed to a hate crime.
Third, “hate,” in the dictionary sense of a strong emotional response is often not involved in
the commission of a so-called hate crime. In fact, many of the most violent crimes have been
committed with cold deliberation by psychopaths who are incapable of strong emotions. Even
more, prejudice is not always the primary motivation in an attack on persons or property because
of their race, religion, ethnicity, or other group membership. This is not to say that prejudice is
absent, rather the motivations for ethnoviolent acts vary and include fear, conformity, loss of
control, or even, as the soldiers at the Abu Graib prison grotesquely demonstrated, for recreation.
Fourth, hate crimes, by definition, only refer to a handful of serious crimes: murder, rape,
assault, and so on. Repeated harassment or acts of intimidation which do serious psychological, but
not physical, damage to the victim are seldom counted as a hate crime. While race, religion, and
ethnicity are included in virtually all state statutes, sexual orientation, gender, disability, and age are
not included in most hate crime laws.
Fifth, hate crime statistics would make sense if all such crimes and incidents were reported
to public authorities. They are not. Social surveys indicate that the majority of prejudice-motivated
crimes and incidents are not reported. In workplace settings, as many as half of such events are not
reported, while on college campuses as many as 80 percent of students do not report their
victimization. The relatively small number of official reports to legal authorities has bolstered the
idea that hate crimes and incidents are not seriously prevalent.
The surveys do indicate that every year 20 to 25 percent of minority persons are victims of a
prejudice-motivated act where the intent of the actor was to inflict physical or psychological harm.
Whites experience such victimization at a rate of 10 to 15 percent.
Sixth, when victims are asked why they did not report what happened to them, they give
two primary reasons. They don’t believe that authorities would do anything about it and they don’t
believe authorities could do anything about it. There are, of course, many other factors involved,
but these two, I would argue, reflect accurately on a recognition of the national unwillingness of
elites to attack the problems of prejudice directly.
Seventh, hate crimes and incidents do more damage than similar acts which are not
motivated by prejudice. Not only do they tear away at the fabric of community, but they do serious
harm to its victims. The research of The Prejudice Institute has demonstrated that the level of
trauma is greater for hate crime victims.
Eighth, since the initial federal, hate crimes legislation (1990), some criminologists have
claimed that most hate crimes are committed by teenagers and by members of White supremacist
hate groups. The research says otherwise. There are no age or even ideological boundaries
distinguishing perpetrators. To be sure, there are many different types of perpetrators, but basically
they come from all over the socioeconomic spectrum.
Ninth, as the seriousness of hate crimes came to be established, social psychologists began
examining the traumatic effects of “hate speech.” As might be expected, their research has
demonstrated that words do wound. Acts of verbal aggression and the use of icons of hate such as
a swastika or burning cross, are psychologically violent. In fact, acts of verbal aggression are not
only traumatic, but they frequently evoke as much suffering as acts of physical violence.
Tenth, the conservative response to hate crimes is to try and explain them away as
perceptions defined by “political correctness.” They argue that you can’t very often tell whether a
crime or incident is motivated by prejudice. The label is applied, then, as an act of political
correctness. Actually, it is surprisingly easy to identify crimes motivated by prejudice. For one
thing, most perpetrators want their act to be known for what it is. Further, they often act against
symbolic targets and in clear social contexts. For example, anti-Semitic acts increase around
Christmas, racist acts increase on King’s birthday. The perpetrators typically use verbal slurs and
name-calling, and they carry with them or leave behind messages that make their intention clear.
Hate crimes are part of everyday prejudices that get acted out in schools, in the workplace,
and on the streets. Recognizing this is vital. However, it is essential that we also recognize that
there is no national resolve among the political, social, and religious elites of this society to act
against discrimination and hate crimes. Without that resolve, a true democracy remains elusive.

*Howard J. Ehrlich is a sociologist and writer and a member of the editorial group of the
Baltimore IMC.

A Hate Crimes Sampler



In a Wendy’s restaurant in Largo, FL a teenage girl paid a 19-year-old boy $10 to
wrap a noose around a 14-year-old Black boy=s neck while a third teenager tied
the knot. The victim states that his life has been Acrazy and confusing@ since the
incident.

While waiting for a bus in Newark, NJ, a group of lesbians were approached by a
man attempting to pick them up. Upon being told by the girls that they were
lesbians, he grabbed a 15-year-old African-American member of the group and
stabbed her to death.

Racist and anti-Semitic graffiti were spray-painted near a playground in
Deptford, NJ.

A bus driver in Los Angeles refused to let a homeless man board then ran him
over in Aa battle of wills.@ In San Diego, three Navy men shot paintballs at
homeless persons. In Tacoma, Washington, a group of four men beat a homeless
man to death.

A 35 year-old White man attempted to kill two Black men in Boynton Beach, FL
by running them over with his car. The perpetrator was open and vocal about his
hatred of Black people.

In Atlanta, GA a group of White teenagers attracted two immigrant Hispanic day
workers by promising them jobs, then beat them with pipes and sticks and stole
their money.

A 32-year-old Black man was killed as part of a white-power initiation ceremony
in Los Angeles, CA.

On their way home from prayers at the Islamic Center in Queens, NY, two
teenage brothers were approached by two Hispanic boys who accused them of
being Taliban members. Five more boys approached and began beating the
brothers. Both brothers sustained minor injuries, and had to spend the night in
the hospital.

In Traverse City, MI a man was beaten by four others because of his sexual
orientation.

Two men were arrested for setting fire to a large wooden cross in the front yard
of a Black family=s home in Sacramento, CA.

In Boston, MA three men tied, beat, and stabbed a pizza delivery man because
they thought he was Muslim.

A four-foot swastika was painted on the doors of the Our Lady of Guadalupe
Church in San Francisco. The parishioners are mainly immigrants from El
Salvador.

A Black teenager was threatened with lynching by a fellow high school student in
Jacksonville, FL.

Swastikas were painted on a sign at a Jewish community center in Tavernier, FL.

In Olney, MD, several neighbors were victims of hate messages. A trailer, whose
owner was Kuwaiti-born, was inscribed with the words ABin Laden lives here.@
Four cars were scratched and a swastika was drawn on the rear window of
another car.

A billboard worker in Asheville, NC covered six billboards with a biblical
message (Leviticus 20:13) that gay men should be put to death.

Eighteen Black and Hispanic youths beat, kicked and choked a 13-year-old White
boy in Cleveland, OH.

In Tallahassee, FL a 41-year-old man drove his truck into a mosque while yelling
ant-Muslim threats.

Racial slurs and obscenities were painted on the garage of an interracial couple=s
home in Anoka, MN.

A man in Grand Rapids, MI was jailed for ethnic intimidation after shouting
racial slurs, baring his behind, and punching two women who refused his
advances.


-- Compiled by The Prejudice Institute
(www.prejudiceinstitute.org)