Baltimore IMC : http://www.baltimoreimc.org
News :: Crime & Police
911 Conspiracy Theories Given Currency In The Main Stream Media
The inner sun burns off another layer of darkness in the minds of the masses inoculated agains tthe truth
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rense.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
911 Conspiracy Theories Given
Currency By Mainstream Media
1-13-2
"Israel does not spy on the United States of America." -- Mark Regev, a spokesman at the Israeli embassy in Washington
Is it possible that the 9/11 WTC bombing has the same fingerprint as the Oklahoma City Bombing?
"Uh-ohhh", you might say, "conspiracy theorist!"
Not all of the Sept. 11 conspiracy theories are being spread on wacky Web sites. Some have been given currency by mainstream media:
* Agence France-Presse, the main French wire service, quoted a former German parliament member, Andreas von Bulow, as saying the Israeli Mossad was behind the attacks.
* The British Broadcasting Corp. aired a program reporting that FBI agents who had been pursuing bin Laden were told to back off after Bush became president. Joe Trento, author of "The Secret History of the CIA," said, "The sad thing is that thousands of Americans had to die needlessly." An unidentified American spoke of "a hidden agenda at the very highest levels of our government."
* CNN in recent days carried extensive reports on a new French book. It claims that a former FBI deputy director, John O'Neill, resigned in protest last year because U.S. pursuit of bin Laden was slowed while the Bush administration tried to negotiate a deal with the Taliban to build an oil pipeline across Afghanistan.
* David Schippers, former chief counsel to the House Judiciary Committee during the Clinton impeachment hearings, claims to represent FBI agents who believe that bin Laden was tied to the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing. And he says the government has ignored his requests for the agents to testify in closed congressional hearings.
* Le Figaro, a French newspaper, reported that a senior CIA official met with bin Laden last July at an American hospital in the Saudi capital of Dubai, where he had been treated for a kidney infection.
* The Los Angeles Times carried a column by Mansoor Ijaz, a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, who said he had negotiated several opportunities for bin Laden's capture, but that Clinton ignored them.
* A Pakistani general, Hamid Gul, told The New Yorker magazine that Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon was behind the attacks.
* The Wall Street Journal reported extensively on ties between bin Laden's family in Saudi Arabia and former President Bush, former Secretary of State James Baker, and former Defense Secretary Frank Carlucci.
In fact, there are
Most Americans believe that Timothy McVeigh did not act alone, and that the government was covering up information leading to other suspects. Even Brigadier General Benton K. Partin ( USAF, Retired) went on record in public testimony as saying that he thought it impossible for a fertizlizer truck bomb to bring down the building. Remember, General Partin is an expert with sterling credentials and a distinguished military career. On May 18, 1995, one month after the bombing, General Partin delivered a preliminary detailed analysis of the event to members of Congress. "From all the evidence I have seen in the published material," Partin testified, " I can say with a high level of confidence that the damage pattern on the reinforced concrete superstructure could not possibly have been attained from the single truck bomb without supplementing demolition charges at some of the reinforced column bases."
As you can see from the New York Times picture pasted farther down below in this article, this seems to be the same method of operation used in the 911 WTC bombing, and the implications are staggering.
See:
www.thenewamerican.com/tna/1998/vo14no15/vo14no15_bombs.htm
and from
www.thenewamerican.com/tna/1998/vo14no19/vo14no19_mideast.htm
Why would so many Americans doubt the US government's official story?" Because they were aware of facts such as the following:
Much of our investigation has focused on the evidence which strongly implicates in the bomb plot members of the White Aryan Resistance and other neo-Nazi groups operating out of a "Christian Identity" compound known as Elohim City, in eastern Oklahoma. (See "Undercover: The Howe Revelations" in our September 15, 1997 issue.) However, over the past two years The New American has carried out a parallel investigation into equally compelling evidence which indicates that McVeigh, Terry Nichols, and their Elohim co-conspirators were subcontractors, and perhaps planned fall guys, for Middle Eastern terrorist organizations with operational cells throughout the U.S. ó including in Oklahoma City. Incredibly, many of these organizational structures are still intact and operating hand-in-hand with supposedly legitimate Muslim organizations. Even more incredible, many of these "legitimate" organizations continue to support violent and virulently anti-American terrorist groups and terror regimes throughout the world ó while federal authorities charged with protecting this country continue to look the other way."
If you dare to follow this incredibly illuminating trial of evidence, someone from "the powers that BE" ( or one of their brainless lackeys) might be asking what you've been smoking. What is Israel's interest in such a monstrous plot, which, of course, no one believes except Islamist extremists who concocted this piece of disinformation in the first place, presumably to detract from the real culprits?
A: Jews never agreed to Bush Sr. (George H.W. Bush, the 41st president) or his son George W. Bush, the 43rd president. They made sure Bush senior didn't get a second term. His land-for-peace pressure in Palestine didn't suit Israel. They were also against the young Bush because he was considered too close to oil interests and the Gulf countries. Bush senior and Jim Baker had raised $150 million for Bush junior, much of it from Mideast sources or their American go-betweens. Bush Sr. and Baker, as private citizens, had also facilitated the new strategic relationship between Saudi Arabia and Iran. So clearly the prospect of a Bush Jr. ( "W") was a potential danger to Israel.
Jews were stunned by the way Bush Jr. stole the election in Florida. They had put big money on Al Gore. Israel has given its imperialist guardian parent opportunities to turn disaster into a pretext for imposing an all-encompassing military, political and economic agenda to further the cause of global capitalism. While Colin Powell is cautious and others are reckless and want to make up for their failure to defeat Saddam Hussein in the Gulf War 10 years ago, the global agenda is the same.
The U.S. spends $40 billion a year on its 11 intelligence agencies. That's $400 billion in 10 years. Yet the Bush Administration says it was taken by surprise. Do we gullible Americans really believe that? Within 10 minutes of the second twin tower being hit in the World Trade Center CNN said Osama bin Laden had done it. That was a planned piece of disinformation by the real perpetrators. It created an instant mindset and put public opinion into a trance, which prevented even intelligent people from thinking for themselves.
The attacks against the twin towers started at 8:45 a.m. and four flights are diverted from their assigned air space and no air traffic controller sounds the alarm. And no Air Force jets scramble until 10 a.m. That also smacks of a small scale Air Force rebellion, a coup against the Pentagon perhaps? Radars are jammed, transponders fail. No IFF -- friend or foe identification -- challenge. In Pakistan, if there is no response to IFF, jets are instantly scrambled and the aircraft is shot down with no further questions asked. This was clearly an inside job. Bush was afraid and rushed to the shelter of a nuclear bunker. He clearly feared a nuclear situation. Who could that have been? Will that also be hushed up in the investigation, like the Warren report after the Kennedy assassination?
From a cave inside a mountain or a peasant's hovel? Let's be serious. Osama inspires countless millions by standing up for Islam against American and Israeli imperialism. He doesn't have the means for such a sophisticated operation.
___
From
"Hello 2002. I've been congratulating myself on my archives because I've been too lazy to write anything new. I've received enough nasty correspondence however, that I'm moved to respond if only to gloat about the accuracy of my predictions - one year later.
Readers will remember I'd been bitching about how ill-informed we were of the stakes in Palestine. In
Gosh I'm good.
Just after the New Intifada began in the fall of 2001, I predicted an unprecedented loss of American lives because of that war. Then TV and newspapers began tracking the disproportionate death of Palestinians over Israelis. The world watched images of a Palestinian boy huddled behind a wall with his father until Jewish sharpshooters picked them off. The United Nations and the World Court tried to sanction Israel and indict Sharon. Then the South African Conference declared Zionism to be racism. European press reports intensified their scrutiny of Jewish Apartheid. Only American diplomats defended the indefensible acts of Jews. Israel had lost control of the propaganda war. Something had to be done. Something was done - on September 11, 2001.
In that essay a year ago I said, "The stakes are getting high. The public opinion wars are fully operational. I think some innocent Americans are very much at risk of losing their lives in a false flag operation designed to create the necessary rage to bring us further into this war. I don't pretend to understand the nuances of the Middle East "conflict", but I do know we are the grand prizes in the propaganda wars. Some of us may have to die, if one side is to generate enough emotion to mobilize American opinion. When it happens remember to ask.... Who benefits? Who is the designated villain? -- And why?"
It took nine months. But it happened. And no matter how hard American Jews try to suppress the truth, it is seeping into the public dialogue. First there were the individual news reports of Israelis detained for filming the attack from New Jersey and celebrating as the buildings collapsed. Fox News Carl Cameron did a 4 part series on the arrest of a hundred Israelis nationwide because of their knowledge and/or complicity in 9/11. The series was a blockbuster, but was aired and forgotten because other media didn't pick up the story. Next thing you know,
Then Austin and Atlanta papers printed stories about "a war that is brewing inside the FBI between agents conducting the investigation and their higher-up politically-connected superiors. The higher-ups warn that the Israeli thing is 'too hot' -- an 'explosive political volcano'. But the lower-level agents aren't buying it. They maintain that the arrested Israeli Jews might just hold the key to the whole September 11 debacle. "These Israeli guys knew what was coming down," says one embittered FBI veteran. 'We would be fools if we let them just fade away into the sunset and pretend they weren't involved.'"
Golly. A false flag owned and operated by Jews? Preposterous? Read the History of the Mossad. This bunch hijacked the first airliner. Sent the first letter bomb. They probably kidnapped Lindbergh's baby. Israeli Zionists are rabid. They're the worst of the worst. And their American, European and Canadian relatives -- installed in the power positions of media and publishing -- keep a tight rein on truth, redefining news coverage of Israeli atrocities as 'retaliation' for 'terrorist' acts of their victims..."
Consider the following:
Barry Chamish from Israel is trying to make us all believe that China is behind all of this. However, in light of the revelations of the
It appears that the contention that the total collapse of the two buildings could not have occurred in the way it did without explosives being planted within the building is correct. Note the following: Notice the photograph to the left. It shows the plane on its way at high speed into the South building of the World Trade Center. Notice very carefully that there is no smoke adjacent to the South building at the level of approach of the plane. None at all. Blue sky. All the smoke is rising from the North Tower, as smoke tends to do. On September 12, 2001, on page 4, the New York Post published a photograph showing the plane less than a second from impact to the South building. Look at it below and you will see smoke rising from the building several floors below the plane before the impact!!!
If you didnít have the photo above, you would mentally conclude that the smoke is nothing other than smoke from the North building. However, the above photograph shows that it was not smoke from the North building, that there was no reason for smoke to be bellowing out of the South building, and that sometime between the photo above and the photo below (a matter of seconds) someone set off an explosive device in the South building contemporaneous with the impact of the high speed hijacked plane into the South building! This supports the contention that it was not coincidence that both buildings totally collapsed but that explosive devices or materials were planted in the building in advance to assure the destruction of both buildings.
Read more...
Email This Article
MainPage
www.rense.com
This Site Served by TheHostPros
Views
Information
Search
This site made manifest by dadaIMC software