OUR ABUSED & NEGLECTED AMERICAN MIDDLE~CLASS & POORER AMERICANS ARE SLOWLY CATCHING ON 2 THIS CONTINUED WEALTHY ELITE TAX FREE SLU$H FOUNDATIONAL $$ LEAVING OUR COUNTRY BILL GATES ...

POORER AMERICANS ACROSS OUR GREAT COUNTRY ARE IN SUCH DESPERATE NEED OF VARIOUS NEEDED SERVICES IT CAN ONLY MAKE ONE WONDER HOW OUR U.S. WEALTHY ELITE LIKE BILL GATES JR CAN RUN AROUND AMERICA CLAIMING THAT OTHERS WORLD~WIDE ARE MORE IN NEED OF HIS VAST TAX~EXEMPT~TAX~FREE FOUNDATIONAL CHARITY HELP ???

LAWYERS FOR POOR AMERICANS HAS NO PROBLEM WITH TAX FREE AMERICAN $$ BEING USED HERE IN AMERICA TO ASSIST OUR OWN VERY NEEDY CITIZENS.

CERTAIN MEMBERS OF OUR AMERICAN ELITE GETTING TAX BREAKS,ESTATE TAX EXEMPTIONS,FOUNDATIONAL TAX FREE $$ AND WANTING TO SEND UNTOLD TAX~FREE BILLIONS OUT TO THE NEEDY INTERNATIONAL POOR WILL NEVER CUT IT WITH US ???

LAWYERS FOR POOR AMERICANS SUPPORTS THE RIGHTS OF ANY WEALTHY ELITE AMERICAN PAYING THEIR FAIR SHARE OF TAX $$ ON THEIR EARNED INCOME THAT LATER DECIDES TO DONATE THEIR BILLION$ TO THEIR INTERNATIONAL NEW WORLD ORDER POOR.

PLEASE REMEMBER MIDDLE~CLASS & POORER AMERICANS THAT OUR WEALTHY COUNTRY CONTINUES TO BE THE NUMBER 1 COUNTRY IN THE WORLD WITH GIVING OF CHARITY TAX $$ TO OTHERS WORLD~WIDE IN NEED.

BILL GATES HAS FOUND HIS NEEDED NICHE HELPING OTHERS IN THE INTERNATIONAL WORLD AND WE WISH HIM ALL THE SUCCESS IN THE WORLD WITH HIS OWN TAX EARNED INCOME CHARITY WORK.WE DO HOWEVER RESENT HIS CONTINUED LOBBY EFFORTS TO CONVINCE ALL OF CONGRESS & AMERICA TO FOLLOW HIS AGENDA WITH OUR TAX $$ PRIOR OUR OWN DIRE NEEDS IN AMERICA BEING TAKEN CARE OF PROPERLY FIRST !!!

LAWYERS FOR POOR AMERICANS DEPLORES THAT THE GATES FOUNDATION & OTHER TAX FREE AMERICAN FOUNDATIONS EVEN HAVE THE ABILITY TO HUSTLE UNTAXED EARNED INCOME COMPLETELY OUT OF AMERICA TO USE ELSEWHERE IN THE WORLD WITHOUT OUR NEEDY AMERICANS BEING ABLE TO BENEFIT FROM IT FIRST AS IN GENERAL TAX $$
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

California Prisons Frustrate Justices

WALL STREET JOURNAL NEWSPAPER

By JESS BRAVIN

WASHINGTON—Supreme Court justices criticized California's 20-year failure to bring its prisons up to constitutional standards, but several suggested that releasing 40,000 inmates—the drastic remedy a lower court found necessary—could imperil public safety.

The Supreme Court is hearing arguments on a lower court's order to relieve overcrowding in California's state prisons. In a facility in Corcoran, Calif., some inmates were housed in a gymnasium last year.

Two decades have passed without a fix for California's inmate medical care, which the state has conceded violated the Eighth Amendment prohibition of "cruel and unusual punishments."

"When are you going to avoid the needless deaths that were reported in this record?" Justice Sonia Sotomayor said at arguments on Tuesday. "When are you going to get around people sitting in their feces for days in a dazed state? When are you going to get to a point where you are going to deliver care that is going to be adequate?"

California prisons hold 164,000 inmates, double their intended capacity. That overcrowding is the main cause of the state's inability to provide inmates the minimal level of health care the Constitution requires, a special three- judge panel found last year.

The panel gave California two years to cut the inmate population to 137.5% of capacity, which would be about 110,000 prisoners this year. While the order didn't specify how to comply, the only realistic way would be releasing about 40,000 prisoners.

That order "is extraordinarily premature," Carter Phillips, a Washington lawyer representing the state, told the justices. California should be permitted to try several alternatives it has in the works, and freeing prisoners should be a "remedy of last resort," he said.

More on the Court

Read more about the Supreme Court, including upcoming cases and details on the justices.

Over the past four years, the state has reduced the inmate population by about by sending some to out-of-state jails and releasing others on updated terms of good behavior. A 2007 plan also envisions changes in sentencing laws to cut the number of people sent to prison.

But Mr. Phillips had trouble satisfying justices who asked for concrete steps in the state's effort to comply with panel's order.

Justice Stephen Breyer said he was shocked by photographs of prison conditions in the court record.

"The pictures are pretty horrendous to me," he said. "It's obvious. Just look at it. You cannot have mental health facilities that will stop people from killing themselves and you cannot have medical facilities that will stop staph and tubercular infection in conditions like this."

The three-judge panel found in a 184-page opinion that the lack of facilities and medical personnel left severe physical and psychological conditions untreated for months or years. "As of mid-2005, a California inmate was dying needlessly every six or seven days," the panel found.

Justice Samuel Alito, however, disputed the lower court's remedy, questioning the connection between overcrowding and substandard health care.

"Why order the release of all those people, rather than ordering the provision of the construction of facilities for medical care, facilities to treat mental illness, hiring of staff to treat mental illness? Why not go directly to the problem rather than address what seems to be a different issue altogether?" he told Donald Specter, the Berkeley, Calif., lawyer representing the inmates.

Mr. Specter replied that more than 15 years of litigation and 70 separate court orders to cure the violations with less dramatic means "have proven singularly to be ineffective."

"If I were a citizen of California, I would be concerned about the release of 40,000 prisoners," Justice Alito responded.

California's prison population, which was over 20,000 in the 1970s, exploded after voters and lawmakers imposed tough sentencing laws in recent decades.

Building and operating prisons is expensive, and corrections spending is unpopular. Nonetheless, said Mr. Specter, if California "chooses to incarcerate 148,000 prisoners in a space built for 80 [thousand], it's going to incur certain obligations," he said.

Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Anthony Kennedy and Elena Kagan probed for a middle ground that could avoid a mass prisoner release without letting the state off the hook.

If given five years to comply, "you think you could do it without any public safety impact?" Justice Kagan asked.

"I think so," Mr. Phillips said. But if forced to release 30,000 inmates or more, "I guarantee you that there is going to be more crime and people are going to die on the streets of California," he said.

A decision is expected by July.

Write to Jess Bravin at jess.bravin-AT-wsj.com

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

LAWYERS FOR POOR AMERICANS IS A INDEPENDENT VOLUNTEER WWW LOBBY THAT SINGS OUT FOR OUR AMERICAN MIDDLE~CLASS & POORER AMERICANS LIVING IN OUR WEALTHY ELITE'S COUNTRY.

* WE CAN ALWAYS BE FOUND WITH ANY WEB SEARCH ENGINE BY OUR NAME, TELEPHONE NUMBER OR E MAIL ADDRESS.

** GOOGLE, YAHOO, AOL, MSN, BING..ETC.. ALL CARRY OUR PREVIOUS WRITTEN COMMENTARY STUFF WITH VARIOUS DIFFERENT LISTINGS.

*** WE ENJOY BRINGING ALL OUR FELLOW little Americans ON THE INTERNATIONAL WORLD OF THE WEB THE GOOD LIFE...

lawyersforpooreramericans-AT-gmail.com

424-247-2013

africa: ambazonia canarias estrecho / madiaq nigeria south africa canada: alberta hamilton maritimes montreal ontario ottawa quebec thunder bay vancouver victoria windsor winnipeg east asia: japan manila qc europe: alacant andorra antwerpen athens austria barcelona belgium belgrade bristol bulgaria croatia cyprus estrecho / madiaq euskal herria galiza germany grenoble hungary ireland istanbul italy la plana liege lille madrid marseille nantes netherlands nice norway oost-vlaanderen paris poland portugal romania russia scotland sverige switzerland thessaloniki united kingdom west vlaanderen latin america: argentina bolivia brasil chiapas chile colombia ecuador mexico peru puerto rico qollasuyu rosario santiago sonora tijuana uruguay valparaiso oceania: adelaide aotearoa brisbane darwin jakarta manila melbourne perth qc sydney south asia: india mumbai united states: arizona arkansas atlanta austin baltimore binghamton boston buffalo charlottesville chicago cleveland colorado danbury, ct dc hawaii houston hudson mohawk idaho ithaca kansas city la madison maine miami michigan milwaukee minneapolis/st. paul new hampshire new jersey new mexico new orleans north carolina north texas nyc oklahoma philadelphia pittsburgh portland richmond rochester rogue valley san diego san francisco san francisco bay area santa barbara santa cruz, ca seattle st louis tallahassee-red hills tennessee urbana-champaign utah vermont western mass worcester west asia: beirut israel palestine process: discussion fbi/legal updates indymedia faq mailing lists process & imc docs tech volunteer projects: print radio satellite tv video regions: oceania united states topics: biotech