Stephen S. Pearcy [mailto:spearcy-AT-pearcylaw.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2009 2:26 PM
To: ADAREINI-AT-ap.org
Cc: mazen almoukdad; Khalid Khawaldeh; Mahmood Daas; magdy hussien;
Mahmood Salem; majed sufian; Malik Alkouja; Malik Shebly; Mark Atchan;
Marth rojas; Masaa Almoukdad; mohamed atik; Mohammed Alam; Mohy Hasson;
Nabil Jabri; mustafadaas-AT-aol.com; Nadeen Nadeen; Nahida Alkhairat; nagah
shalaby; Nazeh Chamtieh; Nedda Nedda; Nestor Fierro; Nezam Almehdawi;
Nick nick; Omar Almoukdad; Osama Alrawi; PasUsa PasUsa; Raed Alkhatib;
riad saeid; Samaa Almoukdad; Samer Abdullah; Samer Saba; Scott Scott;
Shadie Shadie; sharif khoja; Tarek Abedrabbo; Tonie Tonie; Turner
Turner; Vibiana Chamberlin; waheeb alkhairat; Waleed Waleed;
amayreh-AT-p-ol.com; tom_goetzl-AT-yahoo.com; bmurphy-AT-ap.org; IAugstums-AT-ap.org
Subject: Where's the other article?

Dear Mr. Dareini,

Today I saw this article of yours:
news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090520/ap_on_re_mi_ea/ml_iran

Your article was titled, "Iran tests missile with range that can hit
Israel."

Have you ever written an article titled, "Israel Has Nuclear Missiles that
can hit Iran"? If not, why would you first write an article about Iran
testing less lethal missles that can hit Israel?

Why was there no reference in your article to Israel's possession of nuclear
arms (which pose a grave threat to Iran)? Wouldn't it be fair to include
that huge piece of relevant information which would allow readers to infer a
rational motive for Iran's conduct? What was your motive for leaving that
relevant material out of your story? Or did it just not occur to you to
mention anything relating to Iran's motive for wanting to defend itself?

Stephen Pearcy