Obama, the man who won the presidency on a platform of reform has reneged on yet one more promise — the promise to oppose outsourcing.
Obama, the man who won the presidency on a platform of reform has
reneged on yet one more promise — the promise to oppose
outsourcing. In what only can be called a cynical merger of
backtracking and stupidity, the man who many times on the campaign
trail said
“we
can keep giving tax breaks to companies that ship jobs overseas or give
benefit to those corporations that keep jobs domestically”
has now turned about and
stated
his new position:
“Not
all of these jobs are going to come back And it probably wouldn't be
good for our economy for a bunch of these jobs to come back because,
frankly, there's no way that people could be getting paid a living wage
on some of these jobs — at least in order to be competitive in an
international setting."
Tell this to the unemployed Americans who cannot find a job.
Tell
this to the women who now resort to stripping to make a living.
Tell this to high tech workers streaming into unemployment offices
nationwide.
When I heard this, I wondered if anyone could be more
ignorant. After all, who could be so stupid as to believe
that less available jobs is good for the economy. However,
Obama didn't stop there. He followed up with this poison gem:
"And
so we've got to go after the high-skill, high-wage jobs of the
future. That's why it's so important to train our folks more
effectively and that's why it's so important for us to find new
industries - building solar panels or wind turbines or the new biofuel
-that involve these higher-value, higher-skill, higher-paying
jobs. So what we've got to do is create new jobs that can't
be outsourced."
This statement is absurd. The high-skill, high-wage jobs of
the future will emerge from those economies engaged in the high-skill,
high-wage jobs of today and we are not one of those
economies. Moreover, not a single job he mentions could not
be outsourced. Obama mentions, as examples, building solar
panels, wind turbines, and new biofuel technologies. Yes,
these technologies may be a good basis for an economy, but everyone of
them could easily be outsourced. How could Obama possibly
believe they would not be outsourced? That he would state
such an obvious falsehood as a means of covering up his backtracking
from his campaign position demonstrates his arrogance and the contempt
he holds for the working person. Moreover, the only jobs that
cannot be outsourced are jobs involving direct contact between people:
medical services, exotic dancing, and prostitution, to name a few.
As a worker in the high-tech industry, I have not seen my income rise
in any measurable sense in more than 10 years. If anything,
I've seen a decline and that decline is due to outsourcing. I
have seen the need to change jobs increase in frequency. I've
seen American employers lie to the INS in order to import workers to do
jobs that Americans are available to do. I voted for Obama
believing he would keep to his word and work to end
outsourcing. What Obama now suggests demonstrates that his
position on outsourcing is exactly the same as that of George Bush.
Eight years of George Bush has been eight years too many. Do
we intend to stand for eight years of George Bush II?