Dear Sir…
If a jury acquits a defendant, the Crown holds the verdict in contempt by failing to reimburse the defendant for legal costs and other losses and expenses, and by failing to compensate the defendant for pre-trial incarceration. These outcomes are inconsistent with an unrebutted presumption of innocence. They reduce the criminal trial to a charade in which the defendant will be punished regardless of the verdict, and in which, in many cases, one could seriously argue that an innocent defendant would minimize his losses by not contesting the charge.
I consider it my civic duty to oppose this evil by all lawful means at my disposal, including whatever leverage is given to me by my receipt of your "Notice to Prospective Juror". Accordingly:
That will be my position until such time as all acquitted defendants are automatically entitled to costs and compensation.
Lest anyone question my bona fides, I attach a selection of my writings on this subject, dating back to 1991.
Yours faithfully…
— To the Sheriff of Queensland,
December 22, 2006.
Copyright © Gavin R. Putland except as otherwise attributed. Originally posted at Leges Dubiae under the title Application for Excusal from Jury Service. You may republish this item verbatim on your website or blog provided that (a) you include this notice (with hyperlinks), and (b) you re-host any embedded graphics (or otherwise comply with the host's guidelines).
This site made manifest by dadaIMC software