When we cancel other people's human rights, we cancel our own.

= Highwater =


----

The Verdict

The Winnipeg Police Department is running a fencing operation
out of their "Exploitation" Unit. Disclosed by a current
serving officer in the Unit during the preliminary. In one
case used as an example, a law abiding Winnipeg business owner
had 50,000 dollars worth of business equipment stolen, and if
he wanted it back, he would have to make costly "legal"
efforts through a corrupted Justice system in Winnipeg that
holds Canadian Soldiers in complete contempt by "Law". The
Crown has not only refusing to co-operate with defending
Winnipeg citizenry, in relationship to the, National problem
of fencing through bad lawed Police action operations, and the
lotteries [information forwarded in part by the elected
Premier of our Province], but also, in respect to our
sacrificing soldiers. Soldiers who Canada now knows without
shadow of doubt, are being maliciously propagandized through
the corporate mouth pieces of the most heinous war criminal of
history, the ungodly enemy of Creation responsible for
instituting the terrorist crimes of 9/11. Obstructing Justice
by aiding and abetting the terrorist crimes of first degree
mass murder in New York City is suppose to be a serious
offence in Canada. So, as treasonous to Canadian Liberty, the
Crown in my case is refusing to have the police chief, or
other Crowns look into this matter. [I suggested by my Court
motion to our Court system to consider contacting another
office from a different province perhaps.] While the Judge,
publicly for the Winnipeg record, agreed to side with the
Crown instead, without stating the whys - that Justice for
Canada would not be served under his rule on my suggestion.
Just put a soldier in prison if they should dare stand up in
defense with their lives for Canada is what this unjust case,
yet to be reported on by our national press, is turning out to
be actually. I would ask you once again, to please make some
effort to get on local Winnipeg Radio, or Coast to Coast to
plead for some defense on this matter of morality. You know,
this Freedom thing does involve you too. So, George Norrie
and the rest of you lot, listen, I think you've made some
horrible judgment calls, and I'm asking you now, to live up
to your responsibilities to my America, and invite me on for
free discussions on these matters.

All I want is to challenge the man.

Merci.

P.S. Maybe Harper won't be so bad... Doh!

---

A Soldier's Life Held in Contempt


The way I see it, is that I am completely documented correct
on who was responsible for the terrorist crimes of 9/11. I
have my own theories on why our media and police services have
failed our Soldiers by refusing to support my cause directly
thus far, but I am far without hope.

I believe the failures of me gaining direct wide support
through our police services and the Court of Queen’s Bench, is
much more so for fear of uncertainty, and lack of leadership,
than a general, across the board support of furthering Bush’s
war crime sprees by going still silent while Canadian soldiers
are left forsaken. I speak out publicly often regarding the
911 evidence in America, and email campaigns of my writings,
done for public recognition, I’m told, continue to swell to
near epic proportions. Intelligence officers the world over
most certainly know of my position on this matter. Those who
may support the fight for Bush rule in our police services,
can mostly only do so, risking in dishonorable blind personal
fear of the great unknown I figure. And, crazy as this may
sound, I believe there is a spooky cool God, for I’m walking a
groove most all of the time.

The affidavit that starts “1. National Security Issues” was
submitted in conjunction with my motion to request assistance
from the Court. The additional paper “Stand Together or
Don’t”, was an added part of the same affidavit.

The affidavit with 38 positions was submitted with the two
motions, “Order of Production” and “for the Crown to Stay
Proceedings”. Duplicate copies of the same affidavit were
submitted in each respect.

----

radio.indymedia.org/uploads/looking_out_for_number_one.mp3

"Holy Christ.."

---

www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A25177-2004Mar25.html

"Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage contradicted
Rice's claim that the White House had a strategy before Sept.
11 for military operations against al Qaeda and the Taliban."

This indicates that with the foreknowledge gained through
prior experiences of Muslim fundamentalists, such as the
Taliban, being forbidden by their religion [Jihad] to
persecute the innocent, left the Bush Administration with only
needing to do, and had officially done, was to use no evidence
to back up allegations to insure invasion plans, and as a
result, a deliberate treasonous criminal strategy to not
follow the crime scene leads at the real murder scene to nab
to true evil doers. For otherwise - spoil the top secret
plot.

www.indybay.org/uploads/news-tunes.mp3

newmexico.indymedia.org/uploads/2006/01/news-tunes.mp3

These are the motions than were filed on behalf of Johnny
Wizard's defense in Winnipeg. A man arrested for threatening the
continuing existence of the lawless demon anti-Christ, Our Mr.
bush Jnr. The demon nazi who murdered thousands in New York
City as God's enemy. I, beg and plead my case to ALL that
will listen. The tyrannies of suffering on our God happen
when good people go silent in the face of evil. Please do not
forsake all that is good within yourself, by leaving my call
unheard from.

--------

AFFIDAVIT

AFFIDAVIT OF JOHNNY WIZARD

I, Johnny Wizard, in the city of Winnipeg, Province of Manitoba
MAKE OATH AND SAY:

1.

Pakistani ISI Director General Ahmad orders an aide to wire
transfer about $100,000 to hijacker Atta. Ahmad later resigns
after the transfer is disclosed in India and confirmed by the
FBI. [Dawn, 10/8/01, Times of India, 10/9/01, Wall Street
Journal, 10/10/01, AFP, 10/10/01] The individual who makes the
wire transfer at Ahmad's direction is Saeed Sheikh, later
convinced for kidnapping and murdering reporter Daniel Pearl
in February 2002. ABC News later reports, "federal
authorities have told ABC News they've now tracked more than
$100,000 from banks in Pakistan to two banks in Florida to
accounts held by suspected hijack ringleader Mohamed Atta."
[ABC News, 9/30/01] CNN also reports the $100,000 transfer,
and the New York Times specifies that it came in 2000. [CNN,
10/1/01, CNN, 10/6/01, New York Times, 7/10/02] Ahmad's order
must have preceded June 2000, since that's when Atta and
others started opening bank accounts and receiving the money
($109,910 is received by Atta and Marwan Alshehhi between June
19 and September 18). [MSNBC, 12/11/01]

2.

On March 3, 2002, MSNBC's Jim Miklaszewski reported that he
had received anonymously, top secret presidential war strategy
documents dated September 9th, 2001, originating from
Condolezza's office, outlining a strategy to invade
Afghanistan premised on blaming bin Laden a terrorist, but
providing no evidence to back up the allegations, thereby
guaranteeing criminal invasion. Only workable if Laden pleads
innocence to a crime that hadn't yet taken place, a crime
serious enough to "justify" sacrificing American GIs truly for
a liquefied natural gas pipe line for pension thieving Enron.
["The Dahbol Working Group" and Bridas] Any evidence for any
offense would have been sufficient to have Muslim
fundamentalists hand Laden immediately over, as they had
offered [as others of other nations had also] repeatedly
during the Clinton years.

CBC and CNN have still, to this day, consciously refused to do
any follow up on the intelligence, deciding instead on behalf
of dying people everywhere, our public devolvement of a just
society.

3.

RTÉ News - US rejects Taliban bin Laden evidence calls
21 September 2001 17:41

The White House has rejected requests from Afghanistan's
ruling Taliban for proof that Osama bin Laden was responsible
for last week's attacks. According to the US Secretary of
State, Colin Powell, the United States has enough evidence to
try bin Laden in an American court.

The US Government said there would be no negotiations.



4.

[This following document was the official damning account]

Responsibility for the terrorist atrocities in the United States
4 October 2001
www.pm.gov.uk/output/page3554.asp

[This Internet Domain is Britain's Prime Minister's]

"This document does not purport to provide a prosecutable case
against Usama Bin Laden in a court of law."

The document doesn’t hold ANY case, as that was the strategy.... See?

5.

Investigating the Investigation
www.alternet.org/story.html

After playing a tape of Cheney's statement, Russert asked
Daschle, "Did the vice president call you and urge you not to
investigate the events of Sept. 11?" Daschle flatly
contradicted Cheney: "Yes, he did, Tim, on Jan. 24, and then
on Jan. 28 the president himself at one of our breakfast
meetings repeated the request."

...."[T]hat request was made" by Cheney not only on Jan. 24
and by Mr. Bush four days later, but "on other dates
following" as well.

6.

ABCNEWS.com : FBI Called off Terror Investigations
abcnews.go.com/sections/primetime/DailyNews/FBI_whistleblowers021219.html

Two veteran FBI investigators say they were ordered to stop
investigations into a suspected terror cell linked to Osama
bin Laden's al Qaeda network and the Sept. 11 attacks...

`You Will Not Open Criminal Investigations'

7.

October 9 2001 - The Times of India

"While the Pakistani Inter Services Public Relations claimed
that former ISI [the "Pakistani CIA"] director-general Lt-Gen
Mahmud Ahmad sought retirement after being superseded on
Monday, the truth is more shocking. Top sources confirmed
here on Tuesday that the general lost his job because of the
"evidence" India produced to show his links to one of the
suicide bombers that wrecked the World Trade Center. The U.S.
authorities sought his removal after confirming the fact that
$100,000 were wired to WTC hijacker Mohammed Atta from
Pakistan by Ahmad Umar Sheikh [Omar Saeed] at the instance of
General Mahmud [Ahmad]. Senior government sources have
confirmed that India contributed significantly to establishing
the link between the money transfer and the role played by the
dismissed ISI chief. While they did not provide details, they
said that Indian inputs, including [Omar Saeed's] mobile phone
number, helped the FBI in tracing and establishing the link."



8.

No evidence was brought against Laden for nine eleven, none.
[So according to Bush's official top secret Presidential
directives] While Laden himself claimed he played no part in
911. Still, to save the lives of third worlders on the brink
of starvation, Laden agreed to hand himself over, but Bush
refused the offer, while CBC and CNN denied to report on that
fact for the behalf of now dying dismembered American GIs.
Once the indiscriminate bombing began, targeting almost every
building in the country of Afghanistan, Laden then claimed he
had no choice but to fight back to defend US innocent from the
ungodly enemies of Creation/Freedom. Then the clear to all
fake video came out with an actor who's face wasn't even close
to looking remotely like Laden, but for almost the facial
hair. [Bridge of the Jamaican actor's nose is HALF as long in
proportion to Laden’s for example, and surely frightfully
shocking for some, the actor doesn't even take blame for 911
either!] Photos comparing the two faces never aired on CBC and
CNN available in about twelve seconds with the power of the
Internet.

9.

former FBI deputy director and murder victim John O'Neill

"the main obstacles to investigating Islamic terrorism were
U.S. oil corporate interests and the role played by Saudi
Arabia."

10.

Alex Jones interviewing Former German Defense Minister Andreas Von Buelow

"Bush signed W199I months before 911 ordering the FBI not to
stop Al-Qaeda. They threatened to arrest FBI agent Robert
Wright if he tells us what he knows."

11.

Mr. Bush was quoted somewhere regarding Mr. Laden's guilt of
complete innocence with "We don't need any evidence, we know
he's guilty."

12.

www.govexec.com/column/forwardTodaysColumn.cfm

" [FBI's] Edmonds concluded that documents clearly showed that
the Sept. 11 hijackers were in the country and plotting to
use airplanes as missiles. She said documents also included
information relating to their financial activities. "

13.

The honorable Argentinean oil company Bridas' relationship can
not be understated as the Bush Administration's primary motive
on criminal invasion of Afghanistan to save his biggest
corporate backers, the American pension thieving Enron.

From "An American demands the truth from you" by Karl W. B. Schwarz

" I demand to know what energy companies were in that Cheney
Energy Task Force meeting and what discussions there were as
to the steps that would be taken to remove the Taliban and
Bridas Corporation as the last remaining obstacle to the
United States controlling the Trans-Afghanistan Pipeline. I
met that company in 1999 and have known since then about the
Bridas v Unocal, $15 billion interference of contract lawsuit
in US District Court, Southern District of Texas. I also know
about the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals decision on September
9, 2003 that upheld the Bridas $500 million arbitration
settlement and the March 22, 2004 denial of Writ of Certiorari
at the United States Supreme Court, Case 03-1018, Turkmenneft
v Bridas."

14.

From "Fresh Memories of War" by Kandea Mosley, The Ithaca Journal (New
York), 25 May 2002:

"We were told there were no friendly forces," said [Army
Private Matt] Guckenheimer, an assistant gunner with the 10th
Mountain Division at Fort Drum. "If there was anybody there,
they were the enemy. We were told specifically that if there
were women and children to kill them."

15.

Quote from "A Dossier on Civilian Victims of United States' Aerial Bombing of
Afghanistan: A Comprehensive Accounting"

by Professor Marc W. Herold Ph.D., M.B.A., B.Sc.
Departments of Economics and Women's Studies McConnell Hall
Whittemore School of Business & Economics University of New Hampshire

When U.S warplanes strafed [with AC-130 gunships] the farming
village of Chowkar- Karez, 25 miles north of Kandahar on
October 22-23rd,killing at least 93 civilians, a Pentagon
official said, "the people there are dead because we wanted
them dead." The reason? They sympathized with the Taliban.1
When asked about the Chowkar incident, Rumsfeld replied, "I
cannot deal with that particular village."

16.

US TROOPS ADMIT SHOOTING IRAQI CIVILIANS
www.veteransforpeace.org/us_roops_admit_061903.htm

"American troops today admitted they routinely gun down Iraqi
civilians - some of whom are entirely innocent.

And in an admission that directly contrasts with the line
coming out from the Pentagon's spin doctors Specialist
Corporal Michael Richardson added: "There was no dilemma when
it came to shooting people who were not in uniform, I just
pulled the trigger."

The Crown would argue this issue isn’t in her jurisdiction,
however, it is in mine as a expressive communicator fighting
for freedom from real tyranny. An irrational tyranny that
only stands exercised by corporate "news bite" censorship, and
false imprisonments. An American Prosecutor put Sergeant
Benderman in prison for refusing to kill God’s children. Now,
what do you really think America would do, if "they" knew that
too?

17.

Bush demands total impunity on the war crimes he is personally responsible for

www.wsws.org/articles/2002/oct2002/icc-o12.shtml

18.

english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/FD57CF75-62E8-4C43-BF2D-2D0F0F89437B.htm

"Marines said the men fired on them. A senior officer said
they had no weapons, but that with shots coming in the men
were legitimate targets because they ran."

19.

www.yellowtimes.org/article.php

CAIR also wants the Pentagon to investigate a photograph
circulating the Internet of two Iraqi boys and a U.S.
soldier. A smiling soldier stands besides the two boys who
are giving a "thumbs up" sign, as one of boys holds a sign
written in English that reads, "Lcpl Boudreaux killed my Dad,
th[en] he knocked up my sister!"

(Link to photo: www.cair-net.org/images/lcpl11.jpg)

20.

Guardian Wednesday 7, 2001 - "FBI claims bin Laden inquiry was frustrated"
[this story was on Bush’s top secret W199i directive]

This information would take a well paid intelligence officer,
or CBC reporter no more that thirty seconds to look for follow
ups. For, I know, the BBC did also a national news report on
it.

21.

INTERVIEWER: Are you aware that this tank is contaminated with radiation?

SOLDIER: No, it isn't radioactive.

INTERVIEWER: But we have measured it.

SOLDIER: No, it isn't radioactive, not this tank.

"Basra is on a river," he noted. "A DU shell poisons the
water in a river. It poisons the grasses and the grains. It
sinks into the ground and poisons the water table. When it
gets into the body, it does incredible damage. The
combination of radioactivity and heavy metal toxicity is such
that it affects the DNA in such a way that you get genetic
alterations."

[thousands of tons of measured radio-active toxic waste, heavy
metals, oxidized to microscopic particles as small as a tenth
of a micron have been deposited in our airspace, however, CBC
and CNN have refused to inform ourselves on the scientifically
measurable extremely serious health concern issue..]

22.

Justice Department lawyer John Yoo, "In the exercise of his
plenary power to use military force," Yoo insisted, "the
President's decisions are for him alone and are unreviewable."
Yoo was also quoted recently on CBC national news report
regarding the torturing of innocent people to death, to state
something like "President Bush doesn’t have to justify his
opinions to Canada or even to the United States for that
matter."

23.

The incriminating FBI email dated 22 May 2004, indicates that president Bush personally
signed off on certain interrogation techniques in an executive order."
(See original at globalresearch.ca/articles/FBI.121504.4940_4941.pdf)

24.

U.S. deserter 'didn't want to have to kill babies'

"Mr. House will argue that American soldiers are guilty of
war crimes and that forcing Mr. Hinzman to fight in Iraq
would have made him a war criminal.

He will call as a witness former U.S. Marine Staff Sergeant
Jimmy Massey, who is expected to testify that he and other
soldiers shot more than 30 unarmed Iraqis, including women and
a six-year-old child, at a U.S. military checkpoint."

25.

www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A45373-2004Dec7.html

that a clandestine military task force in Iraq was beating
detainees, ordering Defense Intelligence Agency debriefers out
of the room during questioning, confiscating evidence of the
abuse and intimidating the debriefers when they complained."

26.

www.truthout.org/docs_04/printer_121004W.shtml

A sacked CIA official is reportedly suing the agency for
allegedly retaliating against him for refusing to falsify his
reports on Iraq's weapons of mass destruction to support the
White House's pre-war position.

27.

``I was faced with being deployed to Iraq to do what the
infantry does, kill people, and I had no justification for
doing so,'' he testified. ``This was a criminal war. Any act
of violence in an unjustified conflict is an atrocity.''

28.

Williams's squad stopped a dump truck, and an Iraqi climbed
out. "Light him up!" the sergeant ordered, according to
testimony, and the squad opened fire, killing the unarmed man.
Williams and a squadmate reportedly got into an argument over
which of them had scored Company C's first kill.

29.

It gets worse. We already knew about the Franklin County,
Ohio, precinct that tallied 4,258 votes for Bush when only 638
people had actually voted.

30.

middleeastinfo.org/forum4970
wallofhate.com

Israeli Soldiers Going In For The Kill: A 13 year old
Palestinian [JEWISH] school girl is about to die

"It's a little girl. She's running defensively eastwards, a
girl of about 10. She's behind the embankment, scared to
death."

"Anyone who's mobile, moving in the zone, even if it's a
three-year-old, needs to be killed."

31.

US forces unleashed more than 20 air strikes and some 60
artillery rounds on Monday, said Major Todd Desgrosseilliers.
[...] An AFP reporter in the Jolan district said one building
in every 10 had been flattened. As US-led troops closed in on
the neighborhood overnight, at least four 900-kilogram bombs
were dropped in the city's northwest.

[destructive radius of a 900-kilogram bomb is half a
kilometer, and all TRUE accounts of death rates for Fallujah
alone, a city where the population was forbidden to leave,
exceed two hundred thousand innocent souls.]

32.

The Bush Administration
In rush to defend White House, Rice trips over own words
Friday, March 26 @ 10:12:40 EST

By Walter Pincus and Dana Milbank, San Francisco Chronicle

"Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage contradicted
Rice's claim that the White House had a strategy before Sept.
11 for military operations against al Qaeda and the Taliban.
The CIA contradicted Rice's earlier assertion that Bush had
requested a CIA briefing in the summer of 2001 because of
elevated terrorist threats. And Rice's assertion this week
that Bush had told her on Sept. 16, 2001, that "Iraq is to
the side" appeared to be contradicted by an order signed by
Bush on Sept. 17 directing the Pentagon to begin planning
military options for an invasion of Iraq."

[ And...]

www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A25177-2004Mar25.html

"Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage contradicted
Rice's claim that the White House had a strategy before Sept.
11 for military operations against al Qaeda and the Taliban."

This indicates that with the foreknowledge gained through
prior experiences of Muslim fundamentalists, such as the
Taliban, being forbidden by their religion [Jihad] to
persecute the innocent, left the Bush Administration with only
needing to do, and had officially done, was to use no evidence
to back up allegations to insure invasion plans, and as a
result, a deliberate treasonous criminal strategy to not
follow the crime scene leads at the real murder scene to nab
to true evil doers. For otherwise - spoil the top secret
plot.

33.

Blix nor Elbaradei, nor Kofi, suggested, implied, or stated,
that Iraq had failed to comply with the newest U.N.
resolution: 1441.

HANS BLIX: "And at this juncture, we are able to perform
professional no-notice inspections all over Iraq and to
increase aerial surveillance..."

With complete, one hundred percent access to go where ever the
Bush Administration pleased without delay, left a situation of
an unjust war only detrimental to an ability to bring about
any good or better thing. American soldiers are being
sacrificed for no better good or reason understood, for if
progress will ever be made, it will be when they work to bring
about a political situation that was there in Iraq before the
Bush Administration starting murdering innocent people for
nothing . Well, not completely, for Bremer shipped 19 billion
to Greenspan early on, then, hundreds of millions were sent
back.

34.

Professor Steven E. Jones, a tenured BYU professor, went
public several weeks ago after releasing a 19 page academic
paper, essentially showing how the laws of physics do not
support the WTC's freefall and, consequently, the official
government story. It should be known that World Trade Center
Building Seven was not struck by an airplane, yet fell exactly
the same as the two towers.

Below both towers were found pools of molten steel, only
creatable with the heating by high explosives.

Excerpts from "Me, Art Bell, and 9-11 by Lisa Guliani"

The official version of the WTC collapses defy both Galileo's
Law of Falling Bodies, and also Isaac Newton's First Law of
Motion.

..if we know that hydrocarbon fires can only reach a maximum
temperature of 1517 degrees Fahrenheit, how could they
possibly have melted this steel, when the melting point of
steel is 2,795 degrees and the boiling point of steel (when it
becomes a molten liquid) is 5,182 degrees Fahrenheit.

The existence of these burning pools of molten steel were confirmed by:

- Mark Lorieux of Controlled Demolition, Inc
- Peter Tully, President of Tully Construction
- and the American Free Press newspaper

35.

"To be truthful about it, there was no way we could have got
the public consent to have suddenly launched a campaign on
Afghanistan but for what happened on September 11..."

Tony Blair Speaking To House of Commons Liaison Committee

36.

The Washington Post, 23 September 2001.

At American urging, Ahmed traveled ... to Kandahar,
Afghanistan. There he delivered the bluntest of demands.
Turn over bin Laden without conditions, he told Taliban leader
Mohammad Omar, or face certain war with the United States and
its allies.

Mahmoud's meetings on two separate missions with the Taliban
were reported as a "failure." Yet this "failure" to extradite
Osama without providing a shred of eidence was part of
Washington's documented design, providing a pretext for a
military intervention which was already in the pipeline. If
Osama had been extradited, the main justification for waging a
war "against international terrorism" would no longer hold.
Nor would the ready to go Patriot Act. Incidentally, when
MSNBC contacted the Whitehouse regarding the top secret
invasion of Afghanistan plan, it was confessed that the plan
had been "fully implemented"

38.

"Why of course the people don't want war ... But after all it
is the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it
is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it
is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or
a communist dictatorship ... Voice or no voice, the people
can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is
easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being
attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism
and exposing the country to danger." -- Hermann Goering, Nazi
leader, at the Nuremberg Trials after World War II

39.

On the wall of the National Holocaust Museum: " Thou shall
not be a victim, thou shall not be a perpetrator, and thou
shall not be a by-stander"


----------------

When we cancel other people's human rights, we cancel our own.

=Helen & Harry Highwater=

---

HELP ME FOR CHRIST SAKE!

Please, I beg you to assist me in this cause immediately!

Ack! It turns out that there IS a criminal conspiracy run out of the
Winnipeg Police Department's Exploitation Unit!

Ack!! It turns out that the Crown IS aiding and abetting the
terrorist crimes of first degree mass murder!!

Ack!!! It turns out the Judge threw this whole Revelation thing out
without any consideration offered, while the Crown is currently
working on a public ban of disclosure in Winnipeg on these
continuing documented crimes!!!

50,000!! a pop! Stolen from law abiding business owners!!!

Crimes forwarded to the public in part by the concern of Manitoba's Premier!!!!!

SEND THIS TO EVERY RCMP OFFICER OR SOLDIER OF FORTUNE YOU CAN FIND!

Send this post for me to also Winnipeg media persons or to anyone who
will listen. If you don't, then, you ain't my friend. Come on! Do
something for us, and I promise to help you out later if I can.
Help me through the goodness of your heart, so we won't get
railroaded into prison fraudulently by those that hide in darkness
as pirates of our human will. The will to be free.

The Crown's interpretations of my possessions are not my expressions!!

I AM INNOCENT.

The Judge through this whole thing out for the defense
without any consideration offered to OUR COURT!

HELP!!!

---

Since I am representing myself on these particular criminal
matters, Legal Aid is not required to lend assistance on the
grounds that I'm not co-operating with the system as it
operates through professional Barred representations. [I am
eligible for walk in consultations but nothing of the sort of
assistance I am requesting] Considering the complexity of my
judicial matter, I would request legal assistance from the
Court in these following areas.

1. National Security Issues

I need assistance in understanding the legal statutes that our
national security services are obligated to practice under, to
insure our national security matters are being truly defended
in my respect. No change in summation of my character was
altered, after they were granted a search warrant to verify it
was me who publicly spoke out for honorable FBI officers
denied their rights to speak freely, then as the Court knows,
instead of doing what they argued to grant such privilege to
infringe on my personal liberty, enforced a less than perfect
law that most others would buckle under, even if they harbored
no criminal intent, and would never do anything to infringe on
the rights of any child. For I challenge; it does not serve
Canada's interest (in particular our teen soldiers) to
knowingly have Canada propagandized under the serious failures
of CBC and the National Security Services to lend no wanting
cry to hear REAL FBI officers who factually allege, with
evidence and everything, President Bush's business partner,
(who was at the Whitehouse Sept. 9th working on the top
secret invasion of Afghanistan strategy to heavily arm heroin
pushers who war to keep women as slaves while weaponizing
children - done all for a liquefied gas pipe line to profit
his darling dear Enron) funded 9/11's "mastermind"
"ringleader" Mohammad Atta. Inside sources from the RCMP have
notified me, that in the last four years, Section D's salaried
employees, have done practically nothing to serve Canada's
interest in this respect. While Canada's CSIS does not have
the legal ability to speak out publicly regarding the criminal
transgressions of President Bush, and because of this nature
of CSIS's position, they have almost only fears to live with
by trying. A CSIS officer told me, many were completely aware
of President Bush's criminality regarding his hugely
treasonous actions of mass murder on 9/11, but could do
practically nothing about it outside of filing the reports
with the federal government, or maybe anonymously sending
something to CBC, with no promises that anyone would actually
read it. All the while, the senior CSIS boss brags
contemptuously in public about his ties and commitment to his
friends in the ISI. Perceived easily/mistakenly I'd imagine
as a threat to all of Canada's Honorable police officers and
Judges. [General Ahmad was the Bush junta's appointed head of
the ISI.] I think Canada's Prime Minister Paul Martin is
genuinely a good man, but it is hard to see him publicly take
a stand on this issue, [if he even received said reports] on
behalf of honorable police officers and soldiers everywhere,
in defense of the human race, risking everything, considering
he already does bring about a great deal of good for Canadians
where he stands. [Compared to you know, a let's send the kids
to war for whatever Harper, or nobody in Winnipeg
("officially" 86%) wants us to give away the public assets so
let's do it anyway for ourselves privately Filmon] But to know
the RCMP's Section D, sides that they can't tell us the top
secret reason they have not perused Justice for the sake of
Canadian soldiers who bravely put their lives on the line, of
which some have already died, is a situation no Canadian would
tolerate if they knew these freely available facts to decide
for themselves. Sure we can be counted lucky that only so few
Canadians have died thus far, but when will the sacrifice of
Americans, Afghanis, Iraqis, and soon to be Iranians with the
Syrians, along with more than fifty other countries officially
marked for death by the lawlessly irrational bushite
terrorists, be more than YOUR willing to bare? As publicly
reported repeatedly in European press, Mr. Sattler ordered
the bombing of health care clinics in Fallujah as first strike
targets because he didn't want doctors or nurses to "falsely"
report that his forces target primarily the innocent to steal
more from America in blood and treasure. Then under Sattler's
command, they proceeded to monstrously murder more than two
hundred thousand innocent souls, while covering the region in
radio-active toxic waste that will continue to kill for a
scientifically estimated billion or two years. Hell on Earth
is what un- arrested Sattler represents as an enemy to all
living things. God included. An aside: Did you know the
commander of the Third Infantry, Maj. Gen. Buford 'buff'
Blount III, is truly a Saudi Wahhabist in disguise, who took
up the job at the request of the Bush junta, and subsequently
left near 170 tons of plastic explosives unprotected for
looting in Qaqaa? Why? Well when asked why he commanded to
leave the weapons unattended to instead, go carnage Baghdad,
with, I'm serious, sanctioned thieving expeditions, he
replied, he just wanted to let us know he was there. "We just
wanted to let them know that we're here.'' In Basra, the
coalition is still leaving as of last week, more than 30 known
weapons storage facilities unprotected. See, the neo-con
peenacker gang can't steal everything without a stupid man war
going. Left continuing unattended without national
discussions, leaves further in it's wake, more innocent
victims of war crimes fallen undefended. I would ask that
instead of me seeking to find where it is written, that the
RCMP must be committed to getting the man for nine eleven,
perhaps I can just request we work together, for a national
CBC radio forum kicked off by some kinda joint, international
press release acknowledging briefly our failures to
communicate in the past, and politely request where Canada
could go through open line discussions on these very serious
matters. We must not allow our soldiers to be made
misinformed by CBC's unwillingness to bravely with honor,
defend our great Nation. Or, perhaps, Canada might want to
consider hiring me on as, we'll see how it goes honorary RCMP
spokesperson?, a paid consultant for my expertise in
recognizing the real bad guys, and then I'll go out there, and
win the good fight by using praise with fewer insults. If we
stay committed to defending freedom by defeating war
criminals, we all will be the better for it. Now, take me to
your leader.

2. Local Police Issues

As so was brought to the attention of the Courts in the
previous motions, through considering the charge that was
brought against me, (where no criminal intent in alleged, and
nobody can possibly see a digital image until it is already at
least in one's possession, case closed, I'm free to go still
without my stolen computer gear.) I discover, the child
exploitation unit is not operating in a manner that would
effectually reduce the proliferation of truly illegal
materials. They have included images to demonize me that they
must know are left legal to distribute, or for those couple
images categorized as for sure illegal unto themselves, are
left publicly unhindered when it comes to Police questioning
in a manner that would concern illegal public expressions.
Now, I personally don't believe the Courts are consciously
operating in a nefarious manner deliberately to steal computer
gears to sell as sadomasochists who enjoy seeing lovers of
life go to prison falsely for five year stints, but come on,
something seriously needs to be done in how things there are
run. I believe the failures are, in part, do to the personal
fears officers have of the information universe; for to
acknowledge information sharing through p2p networks or
Usenet, would be to witness criminal code violations by the
score going corporately unaddressed. Like Bush being guilty
for high treason in God's America for example, Iraqi church
goers slaughtered by faithful Bush lovers, women raped by
"freedom fighting" GIs, the sex slave trade, or that VLT's are
being run criminally (section 209, 380(1) 380(2), 181, 52(1-4)
with a math game scam that even a sixth grader can figure, but
not the "Free Press" editor, or commercial savvy CJOB's Vic
G-----. Being our city's big Bush backers, where our dying
universe is simpler, like "we don't need any evidence, we know
he's guilty", refuses a, trying to be responsible citizen to
formulate their own conclusions through our media on why we
have laws. Anyway, I need to have some one to cross check the
"illegal" images through recorded internet domains, to see
which ones are/were located in Canada and elsewhere, and what
if any attempt the exploitation unit tried to limit found
providers. I suspect many providers they would claim they
can't do anything about, are so not because a crime is
occurring, but in that respect, actual evidence of criminal
conduct would be required before an internet provider, server,
or site owner could be recommended for censorship. Not this,
twenty year olds look like they could be ten year olds, or
that, simply naked children being human should not be viewed
in their/our minds as something youthfully beautiful.

To Police effectually, I would suggest a public domain
transparently coded checksum program checker to automatically
recognize, known illegal materials made available free, with a
downloadable database updated by the work of one or two
officers monitoring currently available internet image traffic
- classifiable almost near the speed of electricity across the
country. This action is good to take despite my personal
innocence or fraudulent guilt, for media labelings are
completely impossible to designate content/control, but as
such, shouldn't forbid Police services from locating where
possibly actual hugely offensive content is being distributed
through. With volunteer co- operation of programming, a user,
server, or internet service provider could be warned of
material almost in their possession as expression is
classified criminal so then simply delete it, and carry on.
I'm confident such Police planning with open for public
appeals to fine tune further, would end putting the hugely
profitable exploitation units across the continent almost
completely out of business. Now, who truly wants that?

3. Constitutional Challenges

This possession charge absent intent, where everybody is auto
guilty to lose all their stolen computer gear through
fraudulent demonization of the innocent included, is a for
sure, crime in progress. I'd imagine if we had a public
inquiry, we'd find what the exploitation crews are doing, is
needing to locate only a small few arguably illegal
depictions, then trumping up a lot of fraudulent totals.
Figuring, I'd imagine, if they openly started convicting
individuals for a couple of images they perhaps deleted when
witnessed, people might begin to ask, just how much money is
the unit taking in sold stolen merchandise? Perhaps 50,000
dollars in a single case where the business owner of said
stolen property wasn't even charged for a criminal offense!
No troublesome Court appearance required to protect your
public business image even! Generally, in cases that do reach
trial, all images are seldomly reviewed by the Courts, and at
the "professional" porno viewers discretion, or the Crown, a
small sample is only offered. [The professional naked people
person they have in my case I suspect is lost somewhere in
bushville as the clinically insane, or just extremely helpful
to my Judicial cause, thanks big guy, either way.] This has
worked largely unhindered because lawyers for the defense
wouldn't generally see a connection. For only one freely
available image that you couldn't see until you already had
it, is all that is needed to put a, loss for words Canadian,
in prison for half a decade. Not only that, but such
convictions insist irrationally that the guilty must also be
sexually deviant and require professional counseling. The law
enforced absent rights infringed needs to be Constitutionally
challenged as clearly unjust, and the sentencing structure as
being seriously cruel. [What does one guilty of an actual
assault for comparison get, or better yet, threat of assault
that was never truly made?] So, as a result, I need the
assistance of Constitutional lawyers who would provide me
consultations on prepatory requirements and on the relevant
Constitutional questions regarding this specific challenge.
And maybe co-operation with the Crown or Police chief to tally
records and total sales figures on cases under similar
circumstances to consider the exploitation unit for
re-evaluation. [Example: The foolish, faith in ignorance
argument given by all similar units, is that nothing can be
securely deleted from a hard drive is assuredly patently
ridiculous. Truly indicative however, that we do indeed have
a real hidden problem here regarding their/our intelligence
gathering capabilities.] While maybe supporting public
discussions on how to even improve further, the valuable work
that the exploitation unit surely does do already somewhere
I'm sure to operate for our interests. We may together have
to overthrow CJOB with our human skills at demanding some
space to talk about bettering our lives by communicating
without two minute commercials every five minutes, and opening
up the phone lines to talk about whatever. They take too much
from us as the clearly disenfranchised already. Like, so
who's talk radio station is it anyway?

4. The Crown's Crown

I have concerns regarding the job requirements that our
community asks a Crown to bravely achieve. One, would be to
pursue Justice for the principled betterment of our society.
It is clear to anyone familiar with my case, that our
corporate media managers have decided for one fear or another,
that such noble reaches must be left from the grasp of
Canadian soldiers and their loving giving families. This
place the Court holds of a principle that all people should be
treated fairly, includes those we know Bush has already had
murdered in America under these left silenced demands for a
true accounting by good police work completed already. The
fear that every criminal Court Crown shrugs off when proudly
defending the innocent in our legal challenges, seems thus
far, absent in support of Justice for Johnny. When I read
statements from the Crown stating, John's legal arguments
against traitor Bush is irrelevant to the case our Crown
hold's against myself, in our name as Canadians, smacks of an
unjust and blind totalitarian state. Corporately broadcasted
uncertainty is forsaking the innocent lives of Bush's
continuing real murder victims. Certainly, the Crown has a
responsibility to pursue just causes, and granted, can falsely
suspect I don't hold the best of intentions towards life with
everything I am. However, the Crown's summations of my
character will never change the official FBI's conclusions
arrived at by following the crime scene leads, at the real
murder scene, to discover who personally is still escaping
arrest for mass murder of our good friends in New York City on
9/11. A crime who's principle perpetrators obviously
faithfully count on this form of injustice to dictate
continuous failures by our Crown to serve our public interest.
For whatever reason, my case documents a corporate news agenda
of non-committal in our pursuit of Justice for ourselves as
the little people. Ourselves, including the Crown's of all
Canada, are, without doubt, denied fair representation by CBC
standards. Canada is being left not defending honorable
American police officers, doing their jobs to the best of
their ability, should not leave too, our Public's Crown
unrepresented. (If the Crowns of Canada so willed it in our
names.) So, I would ask that the Crown's refusal to speak out
for Canada, while fighting to silence my cries with an unjust
as cruel prison sentence, be investigated for obstructing
Justice, and therefore, aiding and abetting the terrorist
crimes of first degree mass murder. Now, how to do this...
I'm not sure. Perhaps the Court's assistance of aid in the
form of one or two Crown offices from a different province in
Canada could be considered, or a Constitutional Law firm more
up on what all I got to work with here. Look, somebody has
tricked my nation, and subsequently our naiver youths, into
excepting Canadians can not hear the silenced screams of
global tyranny. If soldiers the world over need to die for
Bush, let it be for something worth fighting. Freedom must be
Canada, a Canada that would go if asked, in favor of Universal
Justice always. Just ask US.

Your Friend,

John W.

-----------------

I know I'm innocent under the law as it currently stands, and
in addition, I wished to teach our Courts why the law stands
unjust against our public in other respects. With no criminal
intent to obtain or distribute something illegal alleged
against myself, and the simple truth that one can not perceive
an image until it is at the very least, already in one's
possession, says enough by itself. But most importantly, the
Crown's interpretations of my possessions are not my
expressions. Example: I could have in my possession a
written work from one who espouses the glories of war criming,
but I, personally, am diametrically opposed to it's unwise
declarations. I still use it however to gain understanding of
my world in which I politically work to improve God's World
through indivisibly principled reason.


Feel free to do with this as you will.

---------------



THE QUEEN'S BENCH

WINNIPEG CENTRE



NOTICE OF MOTION

For an Order of Production


BETWEEN:



HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN,


and


JOHNNY WIZARD



Accused.



This Notice of Motion regarding an Order of Production is to
have disclosed to the defense, the complete evidence without
undue hindrance, evidence the Crown holds against the accused
as a member of our public. These following arguments are the
reasons why Justice must prevail in these proceedings:

Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms section 7. "No person
shall be deprived of life, liberty or security of the person
except in accordance with the principles of fundamental
justice."

R. v. Stinchcombe "[...] counsel for the Crown is under a
general duty to disclose all relevant information."

In R. v. Stinchcombe, the Supreme Court of Canada held once
again, as any legitimate Court of any land would, that the
accused in criminal cases has a Constitutional right to full
and complete disclosure of the Crown's case. Yet, in the
criminal case involving myself, the Crown's refusal to return
my legal property [such as including my actual expressions] is
motivated by contempt for fundamental justice - for true
accountability - by intentionally working to deceive our
Courts through denying the evidence of one: the charge
against me is truly fraudulent under our law as it stands
currently, and two: that I don't already have the silent
moral support of every honorable top secret intelligence
officer this world over.

Canada's "Commission of Inquiry into the Actions of Canadian
Officials in Relation to Maher Arar"

"The RCMP notes that because national security investigations
are criminal investigations, the possibility of judicial
scrutiny always exists and the presence of this possibility
acts as an indirect accountability mechanism." [Maher Arar was
an innocent Canadian tortured and left for murdered by the
irrational as criminal pro-bush forces negatively influencing
Canadian jurisprudence.]

Firstly, I, like any, need ready easy access to all the
evidence the Crown holds against myself, to indicate a
possibly hidden motive behind her criminal allegations. For
it is in our authority as a free society that the Crown holds
any legitimacy.

It would be unfair for our Courts to side with the unjust
Crown on not giving me ready easy access to the evidence, but
for only by hugely limiting degrees that include costly bus
rides, or as the seriously impractical, hundreds of thousands
of printed texts that would likely fill roomfuls.

I need to provide the evidence of my actual expressions to
counter balance the false interpretations the Crown alleges,
when it comes to asking where specifically the rights of a
child are being compromised when she makes her defined as
sexually dysfunctional inferences. All the images on my
computer, deleted and otherwise, are not my expressions.
Similarly, are all the written texts on my computer those of
words I hold to be my own personal philosophy. As indicated
by the Supreme Court of Canada's Sharpe case, a defense
against fraudulent accusations regarding the Rights of our
children being compromised, can be readily addressed early on
by understanding the possession charge in relative context to
the personal life of the accused.

R. v. Sharpe

"Section 163.1(6) creates a further defence for material that
serves an "educational, scientific or medical purpose". This
refers to the purpose the material, viewed objectively, may
serve, not the purpose for which the possessor actually holds
it."

So, purpose of digital media as determined illegal must
therefore, be backed firstly by criminal intent, for without
any intent you have no purpose. A defense is made available
by the Sharpe decision on personal\professional conduct to
indicate actual established purpose of accused to prevent
blind "overreaching". The Supreme Court of Canada's deep
concerns of "overreaching" are very much apparent in my
particular criminal matter. Conduct of individuals who have
lost their purpose in Police keeping, who aren't being managed
to express through our Police actions, a public interest in
where the "offensable" images are coming from, or came, but
instead, where it's all going as potential new innocent porno
victims with millions of dollars worth of stuff they can get
away stealing. [I've read porno cops in America recently
acquired 300,000 more American names of households to raid,
off of one single server found managed in violation, but have
taken a pause before then moving on to arrest anybody who has
ever used the internet for whatever, to consider, just what
have we gotten ourselves into here.] See, perfectly legal
imagery can be made into illegal thoughts relatively quickly
by the weaker irrationals that exist within our police
services. Where, to prove for the record, a twenty two year
old is only twelve, even when she has in her possession all
her proper paperwork, completed puberty, a living mother, a
popular working web site and historical documentations, is
just foolishly impossible. While at Your end Mr. Surfer
Citizen, your demonized guilty, until proven innocent of
thinking their faulting criminal perceptions, they do
practically nothing to verify. Without needing to establish
intent, they make off like bandits. See, under a simple
possession charge, there is no allegations of intent to obtain
or distribute something illegal, and likewise, not found a
responsible public's interest in seeking the means of which
the criminal content was as could be LEGALLY provided. The
last thing we want in our dying world is a setup where private
legal businesses are selling, promoting, and releasing content
that only becomes illegal when the exploitation unit comes
into your home to steal your stuff by grossly misunderstanding
what the threat actually is.

By exercising our right to perceive representations of that
which is made freely available, is of in itself, important to
the sociologist, psychologist, concerned parent, and of
course, the conceptualizing artist reflecting on our shared
reality.

My private and public expressions are more tuned to those who
are personally responsible in escaping arrest for running
death squads against innocent children in Afghanistan financed
by the undefended as uniformed American tax paying Public,
[10th Mountain Division] a criminal enterprise still cashing
in on the rewards of bush's mass murder campaigns. Or, the
dropping of cluster dud land mines throughout residential
school districts to murder our children indiscriminately.
Mercury tainted vaccines that for sure cause irreparable
damage to North American children, or as currently, about John
DeCamp's just released updated 2005 edition, about the secret
White House-linked national child sex-ring entitled "The
Franklin Cover-up." However, the real motivating factor
[intent] in the Crown's purpose by attempting to pirate our
public's right to defend Ourselves judiciously, is more
specifically because I articulate the HONORABLE FBI's official
publicly available findings on who orchestrated, and funded
the crimes of 911. Namely, Mr. Bush Jnr. along with his
business partner, the still escaping Lieutenant General
Mahmoud Ahmad.

[University of Ottawa Professor Michel Chossudovsky, has
researched the Ahmad/Bush relationship as documented by CNN
ABC et al, and can be quested for at www.globalresearch.ca]

www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO206A.html
www.prisonplanet.com/new_revelations_on_911.htm

The Crown to not fight on our behalf regarding this easily
verifiable mass murder issue, is indicative of an intention,
to cast aside the concern of all children who benefit from my
communicating higher truths for the betterment of the entire
public body. I ask our Court, who, in Canada, informs our
public truthfully as I do, that the "scumbags" Canada's own
General Hillier is referring to get Canadian youths for sure
killed over in his nationally broadcasted barbaric adolescent
bigotry, against all the INNOCENT students of Afghanistan, is
of a People who factually opened up schools for girls under
the Taliban's getting better through communicating
leadership?, and who outlawed Bush's heroin production, and
the slavery and rape of women? Women who were when working at
the Taliban's newspaper, were not required to wear burkas
despite CBC's propaganda to the contrary? The Crown would
suggest her ignorance on such subjects is irrelevant to her
case against me, for those children's lives, and others like
them, are not who she is working to protect. So, where I
demand is a crime against our real God occurring I ask the
hiding in darkness Crown to explain herself publicly in the
light of these proceedings to our Honorable Lord.

The Crown's case argues that a determined selection of legal
images, can be sited under a labeled classification of
"collateral images", as somehow, unto it's separated self,
being an indicator, or summation of my unbridled character.
Therefor, to question such interpretations I need the luxury
and comforts of a stress free environment to ponder the
significant meaning of each of these collateral damages
against ourselves as the innocent the Crown argues for as a
weapon of Justice. For, those personally responsible for
making repeatedly easily verifiable faulting expressions with
the evidence the Crown refuses to return to me as my legal
property, are in all likelihood, still blabbering corporately
un-accosted, the completely blind support of indiscriminate
mass murder in thoughtless praise for war criminal traitor to
Humanity George Bush Jr., their supreme no nothing about squat
leader. While myself, am a well documented public defender of
children's rights and a studious observant researcher on media
matters, who is schooled in the field(s) of Psychology and
Genetics, Sexuality and Religion, along with the chaotic order
to the indivisible nature of life ourselves. [And who when
not terribly busy building this needed defense against the
Crown's alleged criminality, still champion the written word
for Justice being - US all as treated fairly.]]

I also need to show, how I come to be in possession of
another's expressions, of some managed images, or some strewn
texts.

It would be unfair for our Courts to side with the unjust
Crown on not giving me ready easy access to the evidence, but
for only by hugely limiting degrees that include costly bus
rides, or as the seriously impractical, hundreds of thousands
of printed texts that would likely fill roomfuls. While
sitting just outside my police door, could be the public
accuser who professes proudly the deeply ignorant ungodly
beliefs of cop killing and heroin dealing to push US all over
the top with Bush as it's global mastermind. Knowing such an
enemy of freedom who taunts all our judicial matters with true
personal self contempt, is there still escaping public
ridicule, wearing our community's Police Officer uniform,
could create unto itself, an unneeded frustration on my part,
for, I am a honorable defender to all that is Just. A
honorable defender that is needing by threat of false
imprisonment to concentrate on Justice for just myself
personally currently. As the Court well knows, a bushite's
favored public intent is well established by the evidence, as
documented truly criminal being the ungodly. [Hypnotized
lawless through the mechanics of suggestion I would diagnose
for the don't know knowing any better.] There exists no
evidence against bin Laden for 911, nor, was any factually
alleged to exist, and despite what Bush broadcasts
unchallenged nationally on our airwaves privately, Saddam did
actually let the inspectors in to go where ever they wanted
without delay. Furthermore, indiscriminately murdering people
with tens of thousands of cluster dud land mines, 9000
missiles targeting public infrastructure, many multiple 2000
pound bombs containing radio-active toxic waste, along with
the new and improved napalm and phosphorous poison gas clouds
all because we are in the approximate age range of 15 to 55 is
a for sure real war crime going unaddressed publicly by the
Crown, but not by myself. So, the Crown's interest is in
jeopardizing the lives of our children for sure by working to
silence my extremely rare public cries for true accountability
here in Winnipeg.

I am sworn to protect all as indicated by my recorded actions
and praised world wide word. The National Supreme Court of
Canada's Sharpe decision allows this defense to be made on our
behalf.

By Our Honorable Court's "Lord" siding to support claims made
by my false accusers - as the running definitive summation of
what can be claimed as "collateral images" - [legal relative
media content present on my computer,] while judging to refuse
to have returned my therefore stolen legal property so I can
adequately prepare a counter defense against the Crown's
confusions, is nothing short of a crime in progress. At least
it should be. By denying me the evidence the Crown holds in
contempt of our Court, would create an undue hardship on my,
seeking to illuminate the facts from our vantage points.
Having to travel back and forth across the city to view
hundreds of thousands of media messages pertinent to my case
at hand, left denied search tools, and a comfortable
atmosphere, is unduly unfair for all concerned. Now, I know,
I have to deal personally with those who support such a
criminal ungodly nature when I have no choice to, but to have
them located in the same listening vicinity throughout all my
inquiries on stolen legal media content, to spew their
boastful chauvinistic fascist state partiality of how great
George W. Bush is as their master thinking celebrated
American Cop Killer, would leave me unfairly tensioned. I
need the meditative comforts of home study with good coffee
and private friends to ponder my adroit, to the point defense
with the evidence I demand the fair right to contend.

I hold children's rights paramount in the public defense
stands I've made for near a decade, and privately, I'm free to
think my way on anything. The Crown has no right to dictate
what my private thoughts are, especially, if I'm not granted
to speak on her conclusions with the ready made evidence she
don't want me to have returned possession of. My legal
property that the Crown's crew has plans to sell! God, are
you listening?

I need the luxury of computer processing that the Crown used
to surmise her relative faulting judgment of my worth to our
society.

I need returned all my legal possessions, like my real
expressions such as public communications, to fairly challenge
the Crown's refusal to consider such objectiveness on who the
one holding criminal intent actually is on this serious
matter. So therefore, the Crown's crew should not be allowed
by our law to sell my stolen property as they are planning,
while surely as sadomasochists, destroying a life time of my
written works they know mean a great deal to me personally.
Wishing to deprive our rights as the community, to be granted
fair treatment in our Court systems of accountability, is
surely what will happen if our Honorable Judge does not Judge
honorably against the Crown and grant me the legal return of
my stolen property. I need to establish the mechanics of my
specifically unique computer system, so I can establish my
fair defense made available by the Supreme Court of Canada's
Standing Sharpe decision.

The Court recognizes finding that all declared illegal
possessions serve a criminal purpose without any intent,
unless found serving otherwise by made available evidence from
the defense. [ergo my Constitutional challenge] Evidence of
real purpose the Crown doesn't want to grant our Court,
because usually, guilty or innocent, they do sell everybody's
stolen stuff actually. And truly, the Crown has expressed no
interest in assisting our Police agencies in apprehending
those known responsible by the evidence for first degree mass
murders. [Instead, pick on the helpless innocent little
Jewish man bearing a cross, as cowardly brown shirt jack boot
nazi fascists under Hitler would have too. [surprising for
many, it is formally illegal to be Jewish currently in God's
Israel. As for the Crowns in my case, and the Judge, well
they seem to be not all that bad over all. [So far... But
this innocent people go to prison for speaking un-contended
truths thing for me is just some extreme to the core serious
business of ours, and good or bad, the Judges, and the Crowns,
and the Police Officers have a paid job to do by following the
rules designed ultimately in purpose to protect both me and
you. So, can't we all just find a way to get our public news
agencies to live up to our responsibilities by recognizing
standing laws not yet enforced against the un-elected
dictator, the monstrous war mongering American traitor
criminal, 911's George Bush Jnr., instead of present
company???]]]

I need returned my 37,333 [minus the contended for argument]
images to sensibly consider their feasibility to collectively
represent the Crown's faulting illogical argument in a
brighter picture.

I need to show what I did with obtained media information on
general terms by mechanical processing through my very
specific as unique operating systems, and through my
definitive writing on the very subject we are here
considering. I need operating script batch programs that do
specific tasks regarding general media managements.

I need to show how Usenet [early raw based sub-internet
knowledge sharing web communications system] is used, and how
it was legally accessed by my specific personal system,
granting me, to be a part of one of the greatest collected
artistic expressions of the known world. And how, when using
such services, informations aren't found perceived until, at
the very least, they are already in one's possession, thereby
making the Crown's standing accusation absent criminal intent
clearly unjust. [those responsible for
distribution/expression of actual for real illegal depictions
are where the infraction against the public's interest can be
compromised, but the exploitation units I'm aware of seem to
have little of no financial interest in recognizing such a
wanting to lose their lucrative industry brokered through what
should be worked to be made into redundancy.]

I need returned possession of my computer content, to seek for
indicative examples of huge disparities with what is described
with the Crown's own relative definitions, and what my media
machine actually contains regarding my for real expressions.
I need to reference my personal writings surmising the
faulting state of the child porn policing industry. To
surmise grand totals, as such the Crown's crew alleges of
legal content she'll bemoan despairingly of collateral damages
against us as innocence. Knock knock knock.

If the Crown argues falsely that the evidence I request is
irrelevant to he