Killing Iraqi intellectuals, bombing mosques and churches to create sectarian violence like Lebanon and many more crimes under the patronage of America and USA to make Iraqi resistance ugly and cruel! Why these two Britons (Mossad agents?)
Mossad in Iraq, since the Zionised American Terrorism! Do you know anything about it? If so, please write.
Killing Iraqi intellectuals, bombing mosques and churches to create sectarian violence like Lebanon and many more crimes under the patronage of America and USA to make Iraqi resistance ugly and cruel! Why these two Britons (Mossad agents?) were carrying so many weapons in Arab disguise at Basra on Monday? Why did they refuse to follow Police instructions?
Why did Tony Blair issue orders even to attack the jail and free them? Is it because, the invasion of Iraq was primarily to:
1. Protect Israel and
2. Hijack Iraqi oil?
From: "Austin Powers"
Date: Fri Sep 23, 2005 1:27 pm
Subject: Re: ISRAELI RELEASED FROM ABU GHRAIB
Bush, under advice from his Neo-con handlers, sent US officers to
Israel to train with the IDF to prepare for Iraq. Now we learn the
IDF is fighting within our ranks in Iraq.
A number of officers are questioning whether we have a fifth column
operating behind the lines. There have been too many sophisticated
ambushes, and the enemy seems to know every move isolated patrols
make.
After Blackwater Security was ambushed twice, they want no part of
any Israelis.
AIPAC and JINSA advised Bush on suitable Generals for our Iraq
invasion, and our troops are paying the price.
From: "taxirevolution"
Date: Thu Sep 22, 2005 9:53 pm
Subject: Re: British Tanks in Basra: Burning for Mr. Rothschil
(1.) ISRAELI RELEASED FROM ABU GHRAIB
groups.yahoo.com/group/freeamericanow/message/25053
(2.) Come On Basra
groups.yahoo.com/group/freeamericanow/message/25017
(3.) Petrol bombs fly as 'tanks' free SAS men
groups.yahoo.com/group/freeamericanow/message/25018
(4.) The day that Iraqi anger exploded in the face of the British
occupiers
groups.yahoo.com/group/freeamericanow/message/24961
From: "ruqaya20"
Date: Thu Sep 22, 2005 6:08 pm
Subject: British Tanks in Basra: Burning for Mr. Rothschil
www.aljazeerah.info/22 o/British Tanks%
20in Basra Burning for Mr. Rothschild
By John Bayldon.htm
British Tanks in Basra: Burning for Mr. Rothschil
By John Bayldon
Al-Jazeerah, September 22, 2005
It must have been a great surprise to our Zionist masters that it has
taken so long for their allies in Iraq to ferment the intended civil
war. Now that they have finally achieved their aims and the prospects
of an internal bloodbath are excellent, the British forces should
return home.
They must be brought home to maintain the remaining credibility they
have, and may need for the forthcoming American attack and occupation
of Syria, the 'humanitarian' 'reconstruction' of the soon-to-be nuked
areas of Iran, before any more covert bomb running operations are
exposed.
While it has been apparent to many on the ground, that US UK Israeli
and civilian special ops organisations have been active during the
war and since, running around with bombs, guns and money to ferment
the disorder they pretend to abhor, but which was clearly the
central goal of the invasion plan. (as I predicted it would be, long
before).
It is significant then, that today's events in Basra were reported by
the BBC (British state broadcaster) in the same formulaic way that
they have reported all the other government cock-ups-i.e. They
therefore knew the truth ahead of the selected lies and half-truths:
First- earlier in the day we were told that two soldiers had been
involved in a gun battle, then it was a riot, then that they were
involved in a checkpoint dispute- they had returned fire, had been
arrested, released after careful negotiations, had to be rescued from
a murderous mob, etc etc, drip, drip, drip of selected information,
while all along the websites, particularly the Arab ones were
reporting the full story hours before, and with pictures. Pictures,
which incidentally showed British soldiers on fire, and bailing out
of their heap-of-junk, armoured vehicles- could you credit that?
Could you credit it, in the 21st century, sending troops out in a
modern armoured vehicle that can be set afire! I suppose it is in
the British tradition of inflammable vehicles from the Spitfire and
Hurricane of WW2 and the appalling American 'Tommy cooker' tank,
through to the cut-price, floating firetraps of the Falklands
campaign.
The troops should be brought home immediately, for, despite the extra
strain imposed on US troop numbers by Hurricane Andrew, (and all the
other 'natural disasters' heading for that benighted country) the
remaining numbers are quite sufficient for the job of causing
mischief, protecting Halliburton's oil interests, and extending the
state of Israel, or Rothschildistan, to give its correct and future
name.
Of course, Gt Britain would be made to suffer for thus leaving the US
in the lurch, they would certainly refuse to provide replacements for
the UK's laughable nuclear force- well no problem, we could always
buy some from the place which supplies us with everything else-
China. They would probably be better quality munitions, or at least
cheaper ones, and would not require as presently, an American hand
on the trigger, a handy advantage for when the US attacks us.
Source:
groups.yahoo.com/group/freeamericanow/message/25080