Koran flushing – a new crime of the heartless Americans

Late January of 2005 there was a storm in a teacup about the interrogating techniques where American interrogators were female and they were dressed “provocatively” by wearing thongs which to the Muslim captives was extremely insulting.

KEY POINTS:
1. First it was insulting to the captive to be dominated by a women when in their culture at is a man that is openly dominant and a woman openly subservient.
2. Any contact between a non-mutually married man and woman is strictly regulated so that women (the subservient ones) have to wear hijabs, scarves, and not show any of their hair or flesh.

There is only one quick comment that I have to add to all the above: BOOOOOOOOOOOH-HOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Sorry that the Islamist radicals who wish to perpetuate death onto the United States are imprisoned but since you lost and we won, you’re our captives. I am sure the American captives in Vietnam or other wars weren’t served oatmeal, cornflakes with milk and strawberries for breakfast either. This needless sensitivity about Muslim prisoners is just a clever pragmatic propaganda. Of course they don’t expect we shall give them open access to the Internet nor anything else but a very strongly rooted Christian tradition with most Americans will start to question the methods of imprisonment of these demi-humans, whose only goal was to destroy as much of western civilization as possible – so their propagandist cleverly played the “guilt-card” along with the “political correctness card” – both are working fine, and against our better judgment. It is the Geneva convention that regulates treatment of prisoners – but what if the prisoners are priests, nurses, villagers, common citizens which do not fall into any identifiable military unit? There is no applicability of the Geneva Convention in the cases of the insurgent captives (foreign combatants). The upheld no rules of any kind – we are not mandated to reciprocate but we shall treat them with far greater decency than they would have treated us – yet possibly a little below the Geneva Convention standards.

One effective interrogation tool was female interrogators in the minimal of clothing as reported Jan 28, at: baltimore.indymedia.org/newswire/display/9483/index.php

Another one just took place with the Koran being flushed down to toilet as reported under “Effective use of tools” at: baltimore.indymedia.org/newswire/display/10206/index.php

Another good source is at: www.renewamerica.us/columns/mostert/050518

Let’s be perfectly clear: The state of war (as opposed to peace) hardly has any rules of conduct decency or any other kind. The most dominant rule is “kill as many of the enemy as possible”. All other rules are on hiatus, or temporarily suspended, abolished.

Counting on some conventions or rules to kick in only in cases when it suits the defeated side is incongruous, silly, stupid, selfish and unintelligent – so the prospects of something like that ever happening are even more remote.

Iliya Pavlovich, PhD